Sunday, October 28, 2012
Flannery O'Conner
I have some very mixed feelings about Flannery
O’Conner’s writings. But first, let’s
get one thing straight, I don’t necessarily dislike Flannery O’Conner’s
writings; they’re just not my favorite.
I feel that from what I have read in the Norton book, she’s kind of a
depressing writer. All of her stories in
the Norton book end in some sad way. The
woman’s leg is taken, the whole family dies, and the mom dies. Those were the endings to the three
stories. Granted no one died in the
first story, it’s still sad when her leg is taken and she is crying for
help. I honestly do not like this, I
mean c’mon like can’t there be one ending that has some happiness? As much as I don’t like how Flannery
O’Conner ends her stories, she is still an amazing writer. I found myself somehow compelled to read her
stories as if they were being read for pleasure, not as some school
assignment. They hooked me and keep the
suspense and story going, I felt that there was never a pause from the action,
whether it be internal quiet action, or loud/physical action. Also, I was not expecting those endings at
all, which was sorta coolish, I do like twist endings.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Which story did you have the strongest reaction to, and why? You are right--they are all depressing, but in vastly different ways. Think about the meaning of each story...which one stays with you, and why?
ReplyDelete